Ford Ranger 2012 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Navara is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |