Ford Ranger 2012 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 28 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 17 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |