Ford Ranger 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger 2012 and Ford Ranger 2011 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Ranger 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Ford Ranger 2012 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2011, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger 2012 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Ranger 2012 and Ford Ranger 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | 1450 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger 2011 has more luggage space. Ford Ranger 2012 has 240 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |