Ford Ranger 2012 vs Ford Explorer 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Explorer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 99 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 30 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.0 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 35 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 615 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`144 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |