Ford Ranger 2023 vs Toyota Tacoma 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Tacoma) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 405 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 100 HP less power than Toyota Tacoma, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Tacoma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.8 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tacoma, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | 279 mm (11 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.41 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Tacoma, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 13.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Tacoma, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`190 kg | 2`660 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`314 kg | 2`034 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 876 kg | 626 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Toyota Tacoma. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Tacoma has
| |