Ford Ranger 2023 vs Toyota Tacoma 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Toyota Tacoma) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 278 HP | |
| Torque: | 405 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 108 HP less power than Toyota Tacoma, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Toyota Tacoma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 15.90 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Range per fill-up: | no data | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Tacoma gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.41 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Tacoma, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 14.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Tacoma, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`250 kg | 3`023 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`405 kg | 2`282 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 845 kg | 741 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Toyota Tacoma. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Tacoma has
| |