Ford Ranger 2023 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 405 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 31 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.5 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | 228 mm (9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.32 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`250 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`405 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 845 kg | 980 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |