Ford Ranger 2025 vs Toyota Tacoma 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Hybrid | 2.4 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 278 HP | |
| Torque: | 411 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 90 HP less power than Toyota Tacoma, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Toyota Tacoma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 10.2 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tacoma, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1050 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Tacoma, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 14.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Tacoma, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | 3`023 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`507 kg | 2`282 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 993 kg | 741 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Toyota Tacoma. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Tacoma has
| |