Ford Ranger 2025 vs Toyota Hilux 2025
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Hybrid | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Ranger) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Toyota Hilux), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 411 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 3.2 l/100km + 18.7 kWh/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Hilux, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |