Ford Ranger 2022 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Ranger) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Isuzu D-Max) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 491 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 102 HP more power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.8 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 5.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 870 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Isuzu D-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 265 mm (10.4 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres more than that of the Isuzu D-Max, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`130 kg | 3`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`454 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 676 kg | 1`190 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 76 procentiem less than Isuzu D-Max. Therefore, Isuzu D-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |