Ford Ranger 2019 vs Audi A6 2008
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 34 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 35 cm longer than the Audi A6, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 36 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 546 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.8 metres more than that of the Audi A6, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`270 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Audi A6 has
| |