Ford Ranger 2019 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 63 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`270 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |