Ford Ranger 2019 vs Mazda BT-50 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`270 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`246 kg | 2`105 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`024 kg | 1`095 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem less than Mazda BT-50. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |