Ford Ranger 2019 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 22 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 283 mm (11.1 inches) | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 41 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1868 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`130 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 43 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |