Ford Ranger 2019 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Highlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 356 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 82 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 144 NM more than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.2 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 283 mm (11.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 40 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 454 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2387 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 1.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`130 kg | 2`700 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`510 kg | 1`964 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 620 kg | 736 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Toyota Highlander. Therefore, Toyota Highlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 46 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |