Ford Ranger 2019 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 23 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.0 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 283 mm (11.1 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`130 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`510 kg | 1`958 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 620 kg | 1`052 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 70 procentiem less than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |