Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.3 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`040 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |