Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`883 kg | 1`948 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`317 kg | 1`062 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |