Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger, but lower. Ford Ranger is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`749 kg | 1`855 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`451 kg | 995 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |