Ford Ranger 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 56 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 88 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 822 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |