Ford Ranger 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 209 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 19 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 54 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 975 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |