Ford Ranger 2006 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 323 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 17 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, but torque is 15 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 44 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1920 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Ranger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`041 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |