Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`920 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`969 kg | 2`053 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`231 kg | 867 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |