Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 24 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |