Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 31 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |