Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015

 
Ford Ranger
2015 - 2018
Ford Ranger
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Diesel3.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 200 HP200 HP
Torque: 470 NM470 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Ranger 2015 and Ford Ranger 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Ranger 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.78.9
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km11.0 l/100km
By specification Ford Ranger 2015 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2015, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1080 km on highway
720 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 237 mm (9.3 inches)237 mm (9.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.36 m5.36 m
Width: 1.86 m1.86 m
Height: 1.80 m1.82 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger 2015 and Ford Ranger 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight: 3`200 kg3`200 kg
Net weight:1`969 kg2`167 kg
Load capacity:1`231 kg1`033 kg
Ford Ranger 2015 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Ford Ranger 2015. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 29 80023 800
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Ford Ranger has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv