Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Explorer 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 470 NM | 346 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 49 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 124 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 12.4 | |
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.36 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Ford Ranger is 34 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 595 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 32 800 | 26 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |