Ford Ranger 2015 vs Audi Q7 2015

 
Ford Ranger
2015 -
Audi Q7
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 200 HP272 HP
Torque: 470 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds6.3 seconds
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Ranger engine produces 72 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.76.1
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 390 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1390 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1570 km on highway
720 km with real consumption890 km with real consumption
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.36 m5.01 m
Width: 1.86 m1.97 m
Height: 1.80 m1.74 m
Ford Ranger is 36 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data770 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data770 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1955 litres
Turning diameter: no data12.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`2002`940
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 35 20038 800
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • lower price
Audi Q7 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv