Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 64 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 156 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |