Ford Ranger 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 49 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 36 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 639 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 85 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |