Ford Ranger 2015 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 70 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 70 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 81 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 58 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 897 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 48 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |