Ford Ranger 2015 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 6.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Tahoe) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 226 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 154 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 12.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 13.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2681 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 41 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |