Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger and Nissan Navara have the same engine power, but Ford Ranger torque is 18 NM less than Nissan Navara. Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`933 kg | 1`948 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`267 kg | 1`062 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |