Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 3 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. Despite less power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 7 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |