Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger 2015 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger 2015 engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger 2015, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Ford Ranger 2015. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.0 | |
| Ford Ranger 2015 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger 2015 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger 2015 and Ford Ranger 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 30 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |