Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.3 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |