Ford Ranger 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, but torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Hilux, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |