Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 21 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |