Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |