Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 3 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. Despite less power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 7 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |