Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.3 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |