Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 60 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 31 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |