Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.1 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |