Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Ford Ranger engine produces 58 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`167 kg | 2`180 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`033 kg | 1`110 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem less than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |