Ford Ranger 2015 vs Toyota Tacoma 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Tacoma) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 278 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 78 HP less power than Toyota Tacoma, but torque is 110 NM more than Toyota Tacoma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.8 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tacoma, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 79 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 239 mm (9.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Tacoma, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`167 kg | 2`032 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`033 kg | 508 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 51 procentiem more than Toyota Tacoma. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Tacoma has
| |