Ford Ranger 2015 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 37 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 127 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 51 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |