Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`167 kg | 1`958 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`033 kg | 1`052 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Navara has
| |