Ford Ranger 2015 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is more dynamic to drive. Ford Ranger engine produces 37 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 127 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 51 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |