Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mercedes GL 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 50 HP less power than Mercedes GL, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Mercedes GL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mercedes GL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes GL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 24 cm longer than the Mercedes GL, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 680 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 680 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 600 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes GL has
| |