Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Ranger version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Ford Ranger 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`883 kg | 1`816 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`317 kg | 1`224 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |